Two Turnberry Isle condo associations sued the City of Aventura and a developer entity on August 7, 2026 over 264 units planned on the enclave's tennis courts and spa, The Real Deal reported. My advice is blunt: the land next to your building matters as much as the building. Before you sign, confirm who owns every amenity parcel.
Almost every buyer I take through an amenity-rich building asks the same three questions: how are the reserves, what are the fees, and what is the assessment history. Almost nobody asks the fourth one, which is who owns the land the amenities sit on. The Aventura filing reported by The Real Deal on August 7, 2026 is the clearest recent example of why that fourth question belongs on the list, and it is the reason I am writing this instead of another market recap.
The short version, per the reporting: the condominium associations for the North and South towers at Turnberry Isle sued the City of Aventura and YCM Acquisition, an entity managed by developer Jeffrey Soffer, alleging the city approved an ordinance in 2023 and the project afterward without the sign-off from neighboring unit owners that the associations say the law required. The proposal, according to the suit, puts 264 units plus parking and amenities on the site of the enclave's tennis courts and spa. These are allegations, and they have not been decided by a court. The buying lesson does not depend on who wins. It is the same discipline I bring to any Miami pre-construction purchase: read the land, not only the unit.
What the Turnberry Isle Filing Actually Alleges
Details matter here, so let me stay close to the reporting rather than the headline. Everything below is an allegation from a complaint that has not been tested in court.
Who filed and against whom. The condominium associations for the North and South towers at Turnberry Isle in Aventura sued the City of Aventura and YCM Acquisition, an entity managed by Jeffrey Soffer, who leads Aventura-based Fontainebleau Development. The suit was reported by The Real Deal on August 7, 2026.
What is proposed. Per the complaint as reported, the developer wants to build a pair of towers holding 264 units, plus parking and amenities, on the site of Turnberry Isle's tennis courts and spa. That is the part buyers should sit with. The land in question is not a vacant lot down the street. It is amenity land inside the enclave residents bought into.
The legal theory. The associations allege the city passed an enabling ordinance in 2023 and approved the project afterward while bypassing a requirement that neighboring unit owners sign off. The filing says those parcel owners' rights were, in its words, cast aside. Whether that is right is for a judge. What is not in dispute is that the question of who controls the amenity parcel is now worth millions to the people who live there.
"You are not only buying square feet. You are buying a view, a walk to the pool, and a set of courts you assumed would always be there. Ask who owns that ground before you assume it."Gerardo Gonzalez, Licensed Real Estate Agent at Compass

Amenity Land Is the Blind Spot in Miami Condo Due Diligence
Here is the mechanic almost nobody explains at a sales gallery. When you buy a condo you own your unit plus an undivided share of the common elements. Common elements are defined by the recorded declaration, and a declaration can be narrower than the marketing brochure. A pool, a spa, a golf course, or a set of tennis courts can be a common element you co-own, or it can be a separate parcel owned by a developer entity that you merely have the right to use.
That distinction decides everything. If the courts are a common element, Florida law puts a hard number on changing them. Under Florida Statute 718.113(2)(a), when the declaration does not set its own procedure, 75 percent of the association's total voting interests must approve material alterations or substantial additions to the common elements before work starts. That is a genuine brake. If instead the parcel sits outside the condominium on its own folio, that brake does not exist, and the fight shifts to zoning, the city, and whatever consent rights the recorded documents happen to preserve. That is the terrain the Aventura complaint is arguing over.
My advice on this is simple and I give it to every buyer looking at an amenity-heavy building: assume nothing that is not written in the declaration. Two towers can look identical from the street and carry completely different exposure depending on how the original developer carved up the land forty years ago. The same reading discipline shows up in my framework for evaluating a Miami condo building's financial health, and it is why I read documents before I read a brochure.
The Four Records I Pull Before a Client Signs on an Amenity-Heavy Building
This is the practical core, and none of it requires insider access. Every one of these is public or obtainable through the seller, and together they answer the question the brochure will not.
One, the recorded declaration and its exhibits. Read the legal description of the common elements, not the amenity photos. If the courts, marina, spa, or golf land does not appear in that description, you do not co-own it. Also look for reserved developer rights: future phase rights, expansion rights, and easements that let someone build later.
Two, the plat and the folio ownership record. Match each amenity parcel to a folio number and check who the Miami-Dade Property Appraiser lists as its owner. Association-owned is one story. Developer-affiliate-owned is a completely different one.

Three, the city's zoning and land use file. Pull the parcel's current zoning, any pending applications, and any recent ordinance changes affecting the site. The Aventura complaint turns on a 2023 ordinance, and ordinances are public well before a shovel moves. A buyer reading that file in 2024 would have seen the shape of this coming.
Four, board minutes and the association's legal file. Minutes reveal whether owners are already fighting a proposal, negotiating a consent, or paying counsel. That is the earliest real signal you can get, usually months before anything reaches a newspaper.
Owned, Shared, or Borrowed: Three Ways an Amenity Can Be Held
Not every amenity carries the same protection, and the difference is invisible from the pool deck. Here is the line I draw with clients.
- Owned as a common element. The amenity is inside the condominium's legal description, so you hold an undivided share. Material changes run through the association and, absent a different rule in the declaration, the 75 percent threshold in Florida Statute 718.113(2)(a). Strongest position for a buyer.
- Shared under a recorded agreement. The amenity sits on a separate parcel, but a recorded shared-use or easement agreement gives your association enforceable rights and often a consent right over changes. Middle ground. Read the agreement's term, its termination triggers, and who pays for upkeep.
- Borrowed under a revocable license. You have permission to use land somebody else owns. It reads the same in a brochure and is worth far less. Membership programs at a club-style property frequently fall here.
An enclave built around a resort or country club is the most likely place to find category two or three, because the original developer typically kept the club land and sold the residences. That is not a scandal. It is a structure, and it is knowable in an afternoon if you read the right two documents.
What This Means for Miami-Dade Buyers Right Now
Set against the wider market, this is a due-diligence story, not a demand story. Miami-Dade recorded 2,107 total home sales in June 2026, up 14.3 percent year over year and the strongest June since 2023, with 1,058 existing condo sales, according to Miami Realtors. Condo inventory fell 11.47 percent year over year to 11,550 listings, though months of supply still sat at 12.3. Buyers have leverage and time. Use some of it on documents.

If you are shopping an established amenity-rich enclave: Ask the listing side for the declaration, the plat, and the last twelve months of board minutes before you tour a second time. If any of the three is slow to arrive, that is information too.
If you own in a building where this is already live: Do not price your unit off a headline. Get counsel's read on the consent question, then decide. Panic selling into an unresolved dispute is how owners hand the discount to somebody else.
If you are buying pre-construction: You get the cleanest shot at this because the declaration is drafted and recorded before you close. Read the reserved developer rights and the future phase language. My step-by-step pre-construction buying process covers what to verify at each deposit stage, and the SB 4-D and special assessments guide explains why reserve rules now favor well-documented new towers. If a land fight is the whole story, my post on the Fisher Island land fight covers the scarcity side of the same coin.
Call me at (305) 964-8614 and I will pull the land records on any South Florida building you are weighing, before you write an offer.
Frequently Asked Questions About Amenity Land and Miami Condos
Can a developer build new towers on my condo's tennis courts or golf land?
It depends on who owns that parcel and what your declaration says. If the amenity land is a separate parcel held by a developer affiliate rather than a common element of your condominium, redevelopment is a real possibility. That is the core dispute in the Turnberry Isle case filed in Aventura in August 2026.
What percentage of owners must approve a material alteration in a Florida condo?
Florida Statute 718.113(2)(a) requires 75 percent of the association's total voting interests to approve material alterations or substantial additions to the common elements when the declaration sets no procedure of its own. Many declarations set a different threshold, so read yours rather than assuming the statutory default applies to your building.
How do I find out who owns the amenity land at a Miami condo before I buy?
Pull the recorded declaration and the plat from Miami-Dade County records, then match the amenity parcel's folio number against the property appraiser's ownership record. If the courts, spa, or golf land sits on a folio owned by a developer entity rather than the association, you are a licensee, not an owner. My breakdown of Florida's milestone inspection law covers the other records worth reading in the same sitting.
Does a development fight like this hurt resale values at the building?
In the short term it widens the gap between what buyers offer and what sellers want, because buyers price a risk they cannot size yet. Over time the outcome matters more than the filing. I would rather represent a buyer at a building with a documented dispute and clear records than at one where nobody asked.
Is pre-construction safer than an established enclave on amenity land risk?
Neither is automatically safer. Pre-construction gives you a fresh declaration to read before signing, but developers commonly retain adjacent parcels and future phase rights. An established enclave has a settled record. In both cases the question is the same: who owns the land next door, and what are they allowed to build on it?
More Questions Buyers Ask Me
Prefer to talk? Call me at (305) 964-8614 or WhatsApp.